Friday, May 16, 2008

Fixing ePublishing's Image

Over the past year there have been several ePubs that have gone under, been in the news and/or behaved badly or wonderfully depending on one’s POV. In considering some of the brouhahas, I’ve formed the opinion that a number of these ePublishers have been their own worst enemy. Problem is they drag not only themselves through the mud, but the rest of us as well.

The MisGuided

Some ePublishers are lousy at communication, have a less than stellar editorial process, can be disorganized, can be arrogant and in-your-face with their reactions to reader/author complaints, they can be vindictive, and they can promote images that do little to enhance the ePublishing industry. At times they can even detract from the respectability of ePublishing in general. Some ePublishers have been said to use intimidation. Based on some emails and/or posts I’ve seen, I’d have to say this is true. I’ve been fortunate not to be the target of such emails/posts, but I like to think that’s because I’m diplomatic when it comes to my dealings with people.

It's About Respect

It’s not easy being an ePublisher. You’ve already got one strike against you from the romance community at large. Many romance writers outside of ePublished have this ingrained, and misguided, assumption that ePubs represent poor quality editing, nothing but sex, authors who couldn’t sell anywhere else, and poor business practices. Those assumptions are not always the case, and an argument can be made that some of those assumptions apply to NY press. I've seen typos, bad characterizations, wimpy writing in both print and ePub.

Getting respect and overcoming stereotypes is always hard to do and when an ePublisher behaves badly or goes under then everyone outside of ePublishing automatically assumes that ALL ePublishers (and its authors) are bad and unstable. Not true and not fair, but that’s the way it is. So what’s a “lowly” ePub to do?

Fix The Negatives

The following items are lifesavers in ANY business, but in the romance book industry, being savvy about how you run your ePublishing business brings you respect. And let's face it, ePublishing, particularly in the romance genre, is still struggling for respect. So here's advice from someone trained in Public Relations.

1. Be Proactive – Don’t willingly give anyone the ammunition to trash you. Firing off abusive, unprofessional emails reflects disrespect for the recipient and doesn’t make you look too bright.

2. Keep Communication Channels Open - If you communicate with your authors, they’ll forgive you almost everything, except maybe nonpayment of royalties, but most of them will handle you being late as long as you COMMUNICATE. That means constant updates.

3. Be Open and Honest - Tell your authors what's going on with the business, whether it's good news or bad. Even bad news can have a positive spin. You don't have to spill your guts, but send a brief message that you're improving a process. It keeps the natives happy, and you come off looking like a star.

4. Enhance the Editorial Process – This one is tricky. To not have an editorial process in place means a significant ratio of poor quality in the overall book published. At this point the domino effect happens. Poor editing leads to poor quality story lines because things get missed like wrong names, wrong colors, etc. , which leads to reader dissatisfaction which can equate to reduced sales (no one wants to pay for things that throw them out of a read). In turn this can lead to the company experiencing unstable times, which leads to your good authors fleeing to other ePublishers which makes readers flee. Good authors and loyal readers are the meat of a ePublisher's business. Don't believe that? Close your doors now.

Find a way to implement an editorial process, Find readers who can pass a grammar test and are willing to copy edit in exchange for the free reads. Trade co-op ad monies with authors willing to copy edit the works of others. Are these suggestions the best choice, hell no. In fact, it’s the publisher’s job to have an editorial process, but if you’re shorthanded, money’s tight, or whatever, then you damn well improvise to ensure the end product is the best it can be. Don't just let it fall by the wayside. Your business will suffer because it.

5. Value Your Authors – Every ePublisher is going to have a rogue author. I’ve seen some real wackos of late. They rant and rave and stir up the natives. Whether they’re right or wrong doesn’t matter, what does matter is how the other authors perceive your handling of the matter. If you have one of these lunatic authors in your house, placate them as best as you know how. If they ask for something you’re not willing to give, find something they’re willing to accept. Saying NO and walking away from the negotiation table is more of a LOSE, LOSE situation for the ePublisher than for the author. You don’t have to cater to them, but negotiate, don’t ignore them. There will always be a blog that’s willing to use you as chum for the latest feeding frenzy. See Item 1.

6. Attend to Your Readers – If you have a reader contact you, I don’t care if your mother’s dying or for that matter if you’re on your death bed, you make damn sure someone is able to address that customer’s needs. If your author contacts you and tells you a reader can’t get customer service. Flay some people, but get that reader’s issues resolve. If there’s one thing I know, its customer service. Prompt responses or an apology for a delayed response is going to appease most people most of the time. Common courtesy goes a long way with most people, and for the morons who are unappreciative, suck it up. This is a business and you’re in the market to appease customers not make friends.

7. Learn How To Act In Public – If your company sponsors a party, has a presence at a large convention, or is hosting a book signing, show some decorum. Remind your authors through open communication that they represent the company as well. Explain what your expectations are in relation to their behavior. This doesn't mean you threaten, but reminding them of your goals helps the majority of them act professionally.

A number of ePublishers get defensive when their behavior is questioned, or they don't even bother to respond. No Comment is the kiss of death. ALWAYS, ALWAYS have a positive spin to put on something. Getting defensive or not responding to outside challenges gives the image that either one has something to hide, one is unrepentant about something that happened or worse the ePublisher doesn't know how to run a business. From a PR perspective it's just STUPID.

8. Point People - Have someone on your team who's able to cruise the net and make posts that are a) favorable to your company b) that defuse situations c) that monitor the blogosphere in a way that ensures your house ALWAYS presents a sane, logical, reasonable position on ePublishing.

Angela James from Samhain automatically comes to mind when I think about this point. I really admire her ability to comment on different blogs in a logical, rational manner with information and POVs that aren't aggressive, belligerent or defensive. She expresses her opinions about ePublishing and small press in a firm, nonconfrontational and polite way. She shores up ePublishing's reputation and educates people about ePublishing. Model your behavior like Ms. James and you’ll be doing good!

9. Covers – I don’t see too many Poser covers anymore, which is good, but there are some that are poor quality. I’m not wild about the publisher name on the covers either, but that’s personal preference and I don’t see it as too much of an issue. However it does subtract from artistic space, and it does tell the buyer that it's small press, not mass market.

Ensure that your covers are something more than just a pattern. I’ve seen some covers of late that I have to tilt my head to figure out what the hell I’m looking at. Samhain and New Concepts Publishing have some of the best covers in the business. Keep that in mind when you’re getting ready to hand off a cover for publication. If you don't have an art director, hire one. Someone who has graphical design experience not just someone like me who has a knack for it, but isn't superb at it.

Get the Picture?

So those are my thoughts on what ePubs can do to improve ePublishing’s image. It’s not just about the ePublishing industry; it’s about your company and your ability to get the respect you want. In order to get respect, you have to earn it. Of course I don't run an ePublishing house, but I do have a PR degree, and I have run my own business. So it just amazes me that some houses DON'T SEEM TO GET IT. It's your livelihood, why screw around with it???

Monica

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Save The Internet As We Know It

This is a long post, but an important one. It affects each and every person who reads it because you're reading it via the Internet (or someone printed it off the Internet).

Net Neutrality—Have you heard of it? Here’s a quick explanation at YouTube.com
(go watch, I’ll still be here when you get back.) Seen the video? Worried? Appalled? Mad? You should be.

It’s Rather Simple

Net Neutrality really is quite simple. It’s about putting a middle man between you and your current ISP (internet service provider). The middle man happens to big telecommunication companies like Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T. For sake of brevity, which this post is not, I’ll refer to these companies as V-CATT.

Essentially these middle men or V-CATT for short, will decide who gets faster access or simple accessibility based on service contracts they offer ISPs and consumers, which is money in their pocket and less in yours. It’s also about choice. Your choice to use Google verus Yahoo, your choice to visit YouTube or Daily Motion, your choice to visit this blog (the Gabwagon) or J.C. Wilder’s blog (we’re both ranters, but I think she’s more amusing. LOL)

What Does Net Neutrality Protect?

The Internet is a revolution in free speech, grassroots movements, business entrepreneurial spirit, innovation, and so much more. It is the ultimate living document of free speech and opinion. We access the Internet via our current ISP and reach out to someone clear across the globe. People in China and Tibet are able to tell the rest of the world about the oppression they suffer. We see grassroots movements on the Internet in support of issues where the ground swell of support might have died or grown more slowly without the Internet. We see horrifying atrocities in countries with different values and with just a couple of clicks we see stories that show the human spirit at its very best and brightest.

The Internet gives us the right to express ourselves in a forum where anyone, anywhere can come read our opinion to disagree or agree with us. Its public discourse at its best and worst (flame wars will abound with free speech - I don’t have to like them). With net neutrality, there are significant business advantages as well. Since I’m a writer, I’m going to focus on that business in the post, but there are thousands of all kinds of small businesses this issue will affect in a really harmful way if V-CATT gets its way.

How V-CATT Can Harm Us

New authors need the Internet these days in a bad way. We need it to market and reach out to readers. We put up free reads on their websites (Dangerous Epilogue), we create book trailers to post on YouTube (Linked to Dangerous trailer *grin*), We connect with readers on websites like DearAuthor, Smart Bitches Trashy Books, Romantic Times, Romance Writers of America. We utilize blogs such as this one as a marketing tool to attract readers, and we connect with new readers via MySpace, Facebook, other social network sites and dozens of other forums.

But guess what…if net neutrality goes away, everything I’ve listed above could easily cease to exist, or at the very least, reader access (YOUR access) to that information will be seriously jeopardized whether on their end or yours. For a new author that is the death knell of their ability to market themselves and reach readers in an attempt to build their name. It could easily crush the sharing of information about the romance industry or anything else for that matter. God knows what kind of impact it will have on ePublishing in terms of overhead.

Commerce and Consumers

I’m both a consumer and a businesswoman. On several occasions, I’ve been able to eliminate the middle man in my purchases on the Internet. I buy marketing materials in bulk so it’s cheaper for me to go directly to a wholesale source than head to Staples or Office Max. Discount Shopping Bags.com is one example of my finding a product for a cheaper price than I would have paid at a local store through special order. This type of purchase wouldn’t have been possible without the Internet.

A similar thing happened with a great store in Chicago (God I LOVE the Windy City). Merz Apothecary (history) is a wonderful shop founded in 1875 in a North Chicago suburb. I visited the bricks and mortar store several years ago and found some soap for my husband to use because it makes him smell REALLY good. When the DH had used all the soap I made in my original purchase, I couldn’t find it locally and Chicago is about 1000 miles from Richmond, VA, so I went online, did a search and there they were doing business under SmallFlower.com. That was five years ago and I’m still ordering soap from them.

But what if net neutrality didn’t exist. I might never have been able to access and purchase items from these two vendors. Why? Because V-CATT would be making the vendors and me pay more money to connect with each other. Monies that some vendors would not be able to afford. Money I might not be able to afford. That’s restricting consumer choice and free enterprise. In a word, it’s bad. Bad for the economy.

Tangible Costs

As a business person, I currently pay $38 every month for my Internet connection through Comcast (the DH got that price for 12 months when he threatened to go with competitor V). I pay $55 a year for my website to be hosted on my ISP’s servers. I also pay $10 for two domain names (I have my pen name and my real name reserved). I also pay $10 for privacy on each domain name. So the annual total to have Internet access to have a website and go anywhere I want in pretty much a blink of an eye is $551 a year or about $46 a month.

As a small business woman, I think those are reasonable fees when I average it out. However, based on past experience with cable services, I fully expect my costs for the Internet to go up significantly if net neutrality goes away. I get a lot of bang for my buck since I do all my own web programming, but that will change if V-CATT has its way. God help the author who doesn’t know how to program their own site. They’re going to have to find a designer who either has the same ISP or an ISP with a service contract that allows the designer to access the author’s website for design purposes.

Bad News for Authors

For authors, here’s the worst news of all. Some of my readers still might not be able to reach me because they can’t afford too. Or the connection between them and me will be so slow (dialup anyone?) they’ll be less inclined to visit my website. My website, Cathy’s website, Mac’s website, Natalie’s website, and other small businesses will have to pay more money to make our sites readily accessible to readers and readers are going to have to pay more to get to us quickly and easily. Thus our bottom line is cut into once again by a big corporation. What does that tell you about the entrepreneurial spirit being crushed?

V-CATT’s Argument

I won’t lie to you; there is one enticing argument V-CATT is going to throw out at everyone. They’re going to say, oh but wait, we’re just trying to cut down on piracy by restricting what goes through the Internet pipes. By restricting certain peer-to-peer packets (the data you send out and someone receives) these companies can cut down on piracy. Notice I say cut down on, they cannot eliminate it (crime will always be with us).

However, as much as I despise piracy, I’m not willing to restrict the Internet in a way that stifles free commerce and trade, restricts freedom of speech, crushes the innovative spirit of developers, artists, entrepreneurs or the ordinary Jane or Joe who wants to spout off about issues near and dear to their heart. I don’t want the roads that benefit me as a consumer or as a business woman closed off. Oh, and clearly Comcast does not want us speaking out. Here’s what they did to prevent ordinary citizens from telling the FCC that net neutrality needs to be protected (they suppressed free speech). Oh, and the idiots (Comcast) even admitted to it that they’d obstructed citizens right to speak out about net neutrality.

Choice Matters

This is about choice. The right to make a choice in where I go and what I access without restrictions. If you’re interested in finding out how you can help, visit SaveTheInternet.com where you can send either a standard protest notice to your legislators or you can reword it to put your own words in the letter. Sign up for their news alerts.

This affects each and every one of us. If we do nothing, we have no one to blame but ourselves in the end. And just one final point, this entire post was researched by accessing websites that were made possible by the openness of the Internet. Clearly without open access this article would have been less lengthy, less clear, less accurate, and less visible and probably read by a limited few (although I’m betting it won’t be that high number even WITH open access! LOL)

Bonne chance mes amis
Vie La Liberté —
Vie Le Internet — Vie La Revolution

Thursday, May 01, 2008

Literary Reviews

Recently, I’ve noted a subtle change in the way some websites are doing their reviews. It’s primarily at some of the more visible sites. The reviews being posted have a literary bent to them. I don’t see this as a bad thing. Actually, it’s nice to read a review that fully documents why a book does or doesn’t work for the reviewer.

The interesting thing is that I sometimes feel like I’m reading a review that could easily be at home in a literary magazine, which reviews books like Memoirs of a Geisha, The Joy Luck Club etc. Both excellent books, but I’d probably lean toward calling them general fiction as opposed to women’s fiction. Of course, that’s a subjective observation, so don’t flay me alive if you happen to disagree.

Here I Go Again -- Thinking!

What got me to thinking about these expansive reviews and insightful commentary is that over the past couple of years, I’ve seen a movement to “legitimize” romance. To study romance from an academic point-of-view and see how it reflects our culture and its values. I’ve been a part of it myself to some extent. Although I’ve stepped back from the movement some because I’m not sure my work is a reflection of current culture and /or society mores. That is, I don’t believe my work embodies a Jane Austen quality in which the story reflects social aspects of the time. So thinking about this made me curious as to whether or not the phenomenon of in-depth reviewing of a “literary” nature might be an natural progression of changing perceptions about romance

As someone who tends to over analyze everything I do or say (hence today’s post), these literary-style reviews of romance intrigue me. However it does make me wonder if reviews searching for the inner meaning of life inside a romance novel might be expecting more of a fictional book (any genre) than its primary purpose. What’s its primary purpose? In my mind, the ultimate goal of a work of fiction is entertainment. I write my stories to entertain my readers as well as myself. I don’t deliberately set out to write a book that speaks to current social conventions or is a thesis on women in a patriarchal society. If I were to happen to write a book like that, cool, but it’s not something I have in mind when I write my stories.

If I were to see a discussion of my work in terms of its meaning in the greater scheme of things, I’d probably frown and go huh? I didn’t write it with the intent to discuss the meaning of life. I just wanted to write a good book that entertains my readers—a book that takes them away from their problems if only for a short time.

So what do you think? Are in depth, “literary-type” reviews a way to legitimize romance? Do we need to write stories that contain a “message” in addition to a good story with an HEA? Or maybe as usual, I’m over analyzing the whole thing. *shrug* But at least I got a topic out of it. *grin*

Friday, April 18, 2008

Paranormal Anyone?? Prizes Included!

Come join me at the Raven yahoo group tomorrow (Saturday 4/19) where I'll be talking about all things ghostly as well as my new paranormal, Dangerous, from Samhain.

Joining me as my guest will be Rhianna Samuels, also of Samhain, and the author of Shaking Off the Dust (an excellent paranormal read!).

We're talking excerpts, trivia and other ghostly things, and there will be giveaways throughout the event as well. So if you want to talk ghosts and other paranormal phenomena then pop in for a fun day.

The event runs from 10am to 6pm EST. Hope to see you there!

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Raven_Vampire_Nightclub

Monica

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

What's Better Than a Book

A FREE Book! If you love a good book they're even better when you win them as prizes. Need a romance to get you through the long spring cleaning? Bummed out because you had to skip RT?

Well, hop on over to the Romantic Days Scavenger Hunt Blog! Each morning, a series of questions will be posted about the authors participating. Answering the questions every day gets your name in the hat for downloads and ebooks! But that isn't it. Every person who answers the questions for all four days gets their chance at an Ebookwise Reader:)

Participating Authors

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Exciting News!


WOOT!!

Mirage is a finalist in the historical category of the 3rd Annual Passionate Plume contest sponsored by RWA's Passionate Ink special interest chapter.

Friday, April 11, 2008

Fate and Mob Rule

Yesterday I had a long post that talked about authors and train wrecks. I lost it while trying to save it for posting. I’m convinced a higher power was at work here because I had three different saves of the document and each one failed. I didn’t think my post controversial, but who am I to argue with fate. *grin* So a shortened version might read like this...

Feeding Frenzies

Of late, I’ve seen rabid feeding frenzies online that make Great Whites look like catfish. While the cause these frenzies incite may be just, there is no need to state one’s point with bloodthirsty zeal. That same behavior is what perpetuated the use of the guillotine long after its usefulness wore out (if it ever was truly useful).

With every issue that arises on the net, I’m reminded of that Dragnet adage, “Just the Facts, ma’am.” Give me facts that can be substantiated. It’s not that I doubt your sincerity in sharing your truth, but I don’t know you. I don’t blindly take the word of my own children without a complete investigation, why would I take your word without question?

Don’t Just Tell the Truth – Give Me Facts

Not all causes are just. Not all people tell the truth. Some people have agendas they don’t share with those who support them. When I take a side, it’s because I have as many facts as possible. Don’t show me emails you’ve received, they can be easily fabricated. Show me places on the Internet where the accused has slit their own throat. Show me news sites where the wrong doing shows up clear as a bell. Show me physical proof if you can. Do not expect me to take guidance from others (your friends) when I form my opinion. I can think for myself. Help me believe in your cause with facts, not outraged posts, vicious commentary or obnoxious name calling. In truth, that kind of behavior makes me see you in a negative light, and it doesn’t help your cause where I’m concerned.

The most critical point for me in this post is this—when we allow mob mentality to control our reaction to an accusation or an alleged situation we become worse than those we are rising up in protest against. And I realize most people don’t even care what I think, but I needed a topic, and this one stuck.


Monica